Changes in the Expression of Circulating microRNAs in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patient Blood Plasma After Passing Through a Plasma Adsorption Membrane.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are small non-coding RNAs that mainly function in the post-transcriptional regulation of genes. miRNA that is secreted outside of cells, and which circulates in the peripheral blood, is called circulating microRNA. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a typical autoimmune connective tissue disease and is mainly treated with immunosuppressive drugs. Therapeutic apheresis is often used to eliminate autoantibodies and cytokines. We have previously shown that circulating miRNAs in the blood of patients with SLE can be separated and removed from the blood using a plasma separation membrane. In the present study, we further separated circulating miRNA from three SLE patient's blood plasma by passing it through a plasma adsorption membrane, and then measured changes in miRNA levels using miRNAs microarray chip. Although the levels of many miRNAs were unaffected after passage through the plasma adsorption membrane, expression of some miRNAs, including miR-1246, miR-4732-5p, and miR-6088 are declined.

Separation of Circulating MicroRNAs Using Apheresis in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which are important inhibitors of mRNA translation, participate in differentiation, migration, cell proliferation, and cell death. The pathology of miRNAs results in alterations in protein expression. Recently, miRNAs circulating in peripheral blood have been shown to control the synthesis and translation of proteins at distal sites after intake into local cells. A number of studies are currently being conducted to investigate how to use miRNAs in disease treatment, but no studies have attempted to alleviate disease by directly eliminating miRNAs from blood. Therefore, we examined whether the removal or reduction of circulating miRNAs with apheresis improved pathologies caused by miRNAs. After approval of the study by our medical school's ethics committee, we collected blood and separated plasma samples from three patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who were undergoing plasmapheresis at our hospital. Peripheral blood was collected before and after it was passed through a primary membrane, centrifuged, and used to extract circulating miRNAs. A comprehensive expression analysis was then performed with a miRNA array chip. The levels of expression of a large number of circulating miRNAs were measured in the plasma samples separated by the primary membranes from all 3 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. We present the first report that circulating miRNAs in peripheral blood can be separated and possibly directly removed using membrane separation apheresis.

Safety and efficacy of the leukocytapheresis procedure in eighty-five patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease in which the predominant symptom is polyarthritis that follows a chronic and progressive clinical course characterized by destructive synovitis and various immune disorders. Striking progress in RA treatment was achieved with the emergence of monoclonal antibodies to target cytokines. However, drug choices are limited for many patients due to resistance to multidrug antirheumatic therapy, concomitant disease, and infection. We evaluated the efficacy of treatment in 85 patients with RA for whom leukocytapheresis (LCAP) was initiated at our hospital between 2006 and 2015. All patients continued drug therapy and were treated with LCAP once a week for up to 5 weeks. The clinical response was evaluated at the completion of LCAP series and 4 weeks later using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). The tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased remarkably. DAS28-CRP was significantly improved by LCAP. And furthermore, the efficacy lasted at least 4 weeks after the completion of LCAP. These results suggest that LCAP is a beneficial and are consistent with several trials' reported effect of LCAP. This treatment can contribute to improvements in activities of daily living (ADLs) and long-term outcome by improving swollen and tender joint counts and CRP levels even in refractory patients for whom the use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biopharmaceuticals is problematic. LCAP might be a promise therapy to refractory RA.

Reduction in bradykinin generation during leukocytapheresis using novel cellsorba(TM) CS-180S: Effects of changing the filling solution.

We evaluated the bradykinin generation level during leukocytapheresis (LCAP) using novel Cellsorba(TM) CS-180S, which has sodium pyrosulfite and sodium carbonate as a filling solution. Subjects of this study were 14 rheumatoid arthritis patients. Regardless of the type of anticoagulant used, bradykinin levels were lower with the novel CS-180S than with the conventional CS-180S (28.7 ± 53.3 vs. 8.0 ± 2.7 as the mean ± standard deviation). When anticoagulants other than nafamostat mesilate were used with the conventional CS-180S, bradykinin levels increased at the column outlet compared with the column inlet, and adverse effects of bradykinin were seen in several cases. In contrast, bradykinin levels remained low and no bradykinin-associated adverse events were observed with the novel CS-180S. We recommend using the novel column instead of the conventional column in the treatment of LCAP.

Gene expression analysis using a high-resolution DNA microarray of peripheral whole blood immediately before and after leukocytapheresis for rheumatoid arthritis.

Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a safe, unique therapy pertaining to intractable rheumatoid arthritis (RA) even in cases of drug allergy or infectious states. To investigate how to represent LCAP efficacy, we have conducted gene expression analyses from the peripheral blood of RA patients treated with non-woven polyethylene terephthalate filters. Peripheral blood samples were collected immediately before and after treatment from eight RA patients who received LCAP. Among these patients, all of them achieved 20% improvement in the core set of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20), and thus, they were confirmed as LCAP responders. Gene expression analysis was done with a high-resolution DNA microarray. The results of each of the two groups' gene expression values (immediately before and after LCAP) were calculated using Welch's t-test. Calculations were performed with a statistical software R.basic package: if the P-value was less than 0.05, this was seen as a significant change. In a comparison of 25,370 gene expressions, the number of genes showing a P-value < 0.05 in the upregulating group was 2110, and in the downregulating group it was 1864. The results of pathway analysis using the MetaCore program indicate that gene groups work for cytoskeletal remodeling are upregulated, and genes related to immune responses, such as antigens presenting via major histocompatibility complex class I and II, are downregulated just after LCAP. These findings may relate to LCAP efficacy for RA patients, but this needs further investigation.

Autofeedback from ultrasound images provides rapid improvement in palpation skills for identifying joint swelling in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Joint swelling, an important factor in the classification criteria and disease activity assessment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), renders joint palpation a necessary skill for physicians. Ultrasound (US) examination that visualizes soft tissue abnormalities is now used to assess musculoskeletal disease. We assessed the usefulness of US assessments in enhancing physical joint examination skills. METHODS: We examined 1944 joints (bilateral shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints 1-5, and knee joints) in 108 patients with RA during April-July 2011. We first physically examined and confirmed joint swelling; subsequently, the same rheumatologist conducted US examinations and multiple assessors graded the joint swelling. When the 2 results differed, we received autofeedback from the US results to improve the physical examination skills. RESULTS: The sensitivities and specificities of physical examination for US-detected swollen joint, the correlation coefficient (CC) of the swollen joint counts, and the concordance rate in each patient for joint swelling sites and power Doppler (PD)-positive sites with the κ coefficients between the physical and US examinations were compared over time. We found that the sensitivity of physical examination increased by 42 percentage points (pp), while the specificity decreased by 18 pp. The average CC in June-July was greater than that in April-May. The percentage of κ coefficients > 0.8 increased from 8.8% to 17% for joint swelling and from 8.3% to 14% for PD-positive sites. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that autofeedback from US assessment provides quick improvement in palpation skills for identifying joint swelling in patients with RA.

Recent trends in use of nonbiologic DMARDs and evaluation of their continuation rates in single and dual combination therapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to examine changes in usage of nonbiologic, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and evaluate their continuation rates in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed DMARD treatment data for 3,734 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 1998 to 2009 at Juntendo Hospital in Tokyo, Japan. The DMARD usage rate per month was determined to evaluate RA treatment history in the last decade. We also evaluated continuation rates of nonbiologic DMARDs in single and combination therapies and number of nonbiologic DMARD combination therapies used in each patient. RESULTS: We found that nonbiologic DMARD usage has dramatically changed in the last decade, with the most commonly used DMARD shifting from bucillamine to methotrexate (MTX). MTX showed the highest continuation rate; however, much lower continuation rate was observed when used alone rather than in combination treatments. Further, MTX was also used in the highest number of different combination therapies for a particular patient. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that single MTX treatment may be unable to keep patients in clinical remission or lower disease activity compared with several combination therapies. Recent change in permitted maximum dosage of MTX from 8 to 16 mg/week may improve its efficacy and continuation rate in treating Japanese RA patients.

Single-center, retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as a second-line DMARD in combination therapy and the risk factors contributing to adverse events in 115 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with tacrolimus (TAC) and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). One hundred fifteen rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tacrolimus were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. We collected clinical information, including patient background, treatment efficacy (evaluated using the DAS score), and adverse events observed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze factors contributing to clinical response and adverse effects. The disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) improved significantly at 24 weeks, and continuation rate at 1 year was 57.9%. There was no difference in continuation rate between different DMARD combinations, and not only methotrexate (MTX) but also bucillamine (BUC) and salazosulfapyridine (SSZ) were effective combination partners with TAC. No serious adverse events were observed, and no different inefficacy or safety was observed between non-elderly (<65 years old) and elderly (≥65 years old) RA patients. By conducting multiple logistic regression analysis, combination therapy with MTX and TAC, the number of baseline DMARDs (specifically, ≥3), and old age were identified as risk factors for adverse events. Our findings indicate that TAC is a valuable DMARD for second-line combination therapy in RA.

Effect of various anticoagulant agents on large-volume leukocytapheresis using new Cellsorba CS-180S Filter.

We conducted a study to evaluate the effect of various anticoagulant agents on large-volume leukocytapheresis using the new Cellsorba CS-180S Filter filled with a changed solution of sodium pyrosulfite and sodium carbonate. We conducted the study on a total of 12 cases of rheumatoid arthritis. As the anticoagulant agents we used sodium citrate, nafamostat mesilate and low molecular weight heparin. The new Cellsorba CS-180S was safely used with the various blood anticoagulant agents. Also, through adjustment of the sodium citrate percentage to the blood flow volume, it is hypothesized that it is possible to increase the neutrophil removal rate.

Observational cross-sectional study revealing less aggressive treatment in Japanese elderly than nonelderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have more aging-related complications than nonelderly patients with RA. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to investigate the treatment status of elderly patients with RA. METHODS: Between January and March 2008, 969 patients with RA were enrolled in this observational cross-sectional study. Prescription of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and corticosteroids and laboratory data related to RA, including matrix metalloproteinase 3, rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody levels, were compared between the elderly and the nonelderly patients. RESULTS: Fewer DMARDs were prescribed to the elderly patients (1.40 [SD, 0.57] vs. 1.51 [SD, 0.61]; P = 0.029). Furthermore, a lower percentage of patients received methotrexate (MTX) (47.2% vs. 56.9%; P = 0.0001), a lower average dosage of MTX was administered (5.46 [SD, 1.66] mg/wk vs. 5.96 [SD, 1.77] mg/wk; P = 0.0001), and fewer biologic DMARDs were used (1.46% vs. 5.59% for infliximab, P = 0.0008; 0.58% vs. 3.19% for etanercept, P = 0.0038) in the elderly group. The laboratory data suggested that the disease status was uncontrolled to a greater extent, and complications were more common in the elderly group. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with RA receive less aggressive treatment than nonelderly patients with RA, despite laboratory evidence for poorly controlled disease status among the elderly. The use of a less aggressive regimen could be attributed to the higher prevalence of complications and problems. Therefore, the elderly with RA should be considered a different patient population from the viewpoint of treatment and be administered specialized medical care.

Investigation of the clinical effect of large volume leukocytapheresis on methotrexate-resistant rheumatoid arthritis.

Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is already being used in a clinical setting for the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis, and it has been reported to be effective. However, it is totally or partially ineffective in some patients, which has forced clinicians to rethink therapeutic strategies and concurrent treatment. With the aim of enhancing the therapeutic effect, we carried out large volume leukocytapheresis, with a throughput of 5000 mL instead of the 3000-mL throughput of conventional leukocytapheresis in nine patients with rheumatoid arthritis resistant to methotrexate treatment. Using Cellsorba, the column filled with the unwoven fabric made of the polyethylene phthalate, a leukocyte removal filter, large volume leukocytapheresis was carried out once a week for a total of five sessions. The observation period was the 12-week period following completion of treatment. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set was used for assessment of efficacy. Eight weeks after completion of treatment, a 20% improvement in ACR was observed in 77.8% (7/9) of subjects, a 50% improvement in ACR was seen in 55.6% (5/9) of subjects, and a 70% improvement in ACR was observed in 22.2% (2/9) of subjects. C-reactive protein decreased gradually as treatment progressed, and a significant decrease was observed 4 weeks after completion of treatment. The fact that some subjects had an ACR70 response, few reports of which are observed in the case of conventional leukocytapheresis, and the fact that the effect continued up to 12 weeks after completion of treatment suggests that the degree and duration of the effect of large volume leukocytapheresis might be longer than those of conventional leukocytapheresis.

Filtration leukocytapheresis therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients resistant to or failed with methotrexate.

Filtration leukocytapheresis (LCP) is a treatment for abnormal autoimmune states, which removes responsible leukocytes from the peripheral blood. To examine the efficacy of LCP therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), nine patients were selected, who were either resistant to methotrexate, or failed with methotrexate due to drug ineffectiveness or adverse side effects. For these patients, LCP therapy was performed once a week for five weeks. After five LCP treatments, the patients were observed for 12 weeks, to test the efficacy of the treatment. The definition of improvement given by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR core set) was used for efficacy evaluation of LCP therapy. As the result, 77.8% of the patients showed an ACR 20% response and 44.4% of the patients showed an ACR 50% response. With improvement of joint symptoms, IL-6 was significantly decreased at 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the treatment. The expression of adhesion molecules CD11a, CD11b, and CD18 on granulocytes decreased directly after the LCP treatment. No adverse side effect was monitored during the study period. These results indicates that LCP treatment is a useful treatment for RA patients who were resistant to methotrexate, or failed with methotrexate due to ineffectiveness or side effects of the drug.